Related Products We may receive commission on purchases made using these links

Watch Ultra 3 [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Running & Multisport Smartwatch w/Rugged Titanium Case w/Black Ocean Band. Satellite Communications, Advanced Health & Fitness Tracking

4.8

$699.99 on Amazon

Watch Ultra 3 [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Running & Multisport Smartwatch w/Rugged Titanium Case w/Anchor Blue Ocean Band. Satellite Communications, Advanced Health & Fitness Tracking

4.8

$699.99 on Amazon

Apple Watch Ultra [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Titanium Case with Midnight Ocean Band, One Size (Renewed)

4.3

$299.66 on Amazon

iPhone Ultra leak: Apple's foldable borrows from Samsung's playbook

New renders of Apple's rumored foldable, shared today by leaker Jon Prosser, show a wide book-style device designed to feel like a standard iPhone when closed and expand into something closer to a compact iPad. The iPhone Ultra leak points to a September debut alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup, Android Authority reported today. The renders aren't confirmed hardware, but they're directionally useful even if the exact proportions shift before launch.

The design Apple appears to be pursuing echoes the form factor Samsung arrived at through seven generations of iteration. The display inside will reportedly be manufactured exclusively by Samsung Display under a three-year supply agreement, TrendForce reported two months ago. Apple isn't reinventing the foldable. It's entering with a Samsung-inspired design and Samsung-built hardware.

That context shapes how the device will be judged. Apple enters a market where Samsung holds 64% of foldable shipments by volume, Counterpoint Research data cited by Korea JoongAng Daily showed earlier this year. Consumers already understand what a well-made foldable looks like. The question isn't whether Apple can build one; it's whether it can build one that justifies a price tag north of $2,000 in a category Samsung has spent years refining.

iPhone Ultra vs Galaxy Z Fold 7: what the renders suggest

The rumored device is described as measuring 4.5mm thick when unfolded, with a near-invisible crease and a precision-engineered hinge, thinner than Apple's own iPhone Air but still about 0.3mm behind the Galaxy Z Fold 7's 4.2mm unfolded profile, Android Authority noted today. More significant than that gap is the cover screen: wide, proportioned like a conventional smartphone, built so the closed device doesn't read as something awkward to use in one hand.

Samsung's original Galaxy Fold, released in 2019, had a cover screen Trusted Reviews described as "almost comically long and thin," folded to 17.1mm thick, and offered no dust or water resistance. The Fold 7, after seven iterations, measures 4.2mm unfolded and 8.9mm folded, uses a titanium hinge, and achieves improved water resistance while weighing 215g, lighter than Samsung's own Galaxy S25 Ultra, per Trusted Reviews. After years of criticism over narrow cover screens on earlier Fold models, Samsung embraced a wider, more phone-like display with the Fold 7, Android Authority noted today.

Apple, according to the leak, is skipping the narrow-cover-screen era entirely and landing on the wider format the market ultimately pushed Samsung toward. "If the renders are anywhere close to reality, Apple doesn't appear interested in copying the narrow foldables of the past," Android Authority reported today. That's a reasonable reading, and it also means Apple is adopting the category's mature consensus rather than introducing a new one. The field it's entering includes the Oppo Find N5, Honor Magic V5, and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold, all competing on hardware quality and camera performance, per Trusted Reviews.

Pricing and naming rumors suggest Apple will position the device as a top-tier "Ultra" product, reportedly starting above $1,500 with premium configurations potentially exceeding $3,000, AppleInsider reported three months ago, citing a Weibo leaker whose sole prior rumor concerned iPhone 18 Pro camera improvements. These details should be treated as directional; the supply chain evidence sits on considerably firmer ground.

The supply chain evidence: Samsung as Apple's foundational partner

Apple has reportedly agreed to source foldable OLED panels exclusively from Samsung Display for the next three years, with production of Apple-bound panels beginning in May as sole vendor, Korea JoongAng Daily reported earlier this year, corroborated by TrendForce two months ago. The initial production run is approximately 9 million panels. The arrangement makes Samsung not just Apple's primary competitor in foldables but its most critical hardware supplier simultaneously.

Samsung Display has stated that its next-generation foldable panel features a noticeably shallower crease, achieved through a laser-drilled metal plate beneath the display that disperses mechanical stress at the fold point, combined with ultrathin glass layers on both sides, Korea JoongAng Daily reported earlier this year. The panels will use color-on-encapsulation (CoE) technology, which forms a color filter layer above the encapsulation layer without a polarizer; polarizers can crack at bending points in foldable designs, making CoE a standard approach for recent foldable panels, TrendForce noted two months ago.

Apple is not introducing a new OLED material stack for this device. The panels will use the same M14 material set found in the iPhone 17 Pro Max, a decision TrendForce attributed two months ago to Apple's focus on production stability and cost control. Assembly will be handled exclusively by Foxconn, with hinge components supplied by Taiwan-based Shin Zu Shing. Nikkei has flagged technical bottlenecks during engineering testing that could affect the September timeline, though Bloomberg has reported the launch remains on track despite potential early supply constraints, per TrendForce.

What Apple still needs to prove at launch

Apple's commercial prospects look strong on paper regardless of hardware novelty. IDC projected Apple could capture over 22% of foldable unit volume and 34% of foldable market value in its first year, driven by an expected average selling price of around $2,400. "The real game-changer for the category comes at year-end when Apple enters the foldable space," IDC senior research director Nabila Popal said in a December 2025 report cited by Korea JoongAng Daily earlier this year. Apple's real competitive moat is the segment of iPhone users who simply won't switch to Android regardless of what Samsung builds, and that segment is large enough to make first-year economics work.

Selling to loyal iPhone users and earning a reputation as a serious foldable product are different things, though. The criteria that will determine the latter are almost entirely absent from the current leak evidence: battery capacity at 4.5mm thickness, software multitasking capabilities, real-world crease performance over time, and whether Apple's ecosystem integration provides a foldable-specific experience that justifies the premium over what Samsung already ships. The thinness ambition echoes the iPhone Air pattern of trading battery headroom for form, a tradeoff Trusted Reviews flagged last year as a concern worth watching.

The "Ultra" framing, if it holds, signals Apple's explicit intent: sell status and engineering refinement, not category innovation. That's a coherent strategy. It also raises the burden of justification at a $2,000-plus price point, where a buyer comparing the iPhone Ultra against a Fold 7 or Fold 8 is weighing a first-generation Apple foldable against Samsung's seventh or eighth. The renders suggest Apple has studied the category carefully. September will show whether that study translates into a device that earns its price or simply one that succeeds on brand alone.

What to watch when the device ships

The most significant takeaway from today's iPhone Ultra leak isn't the 4.5mm measurement or the speculated name. It's the position Apple is entering from. The design reflects the consensus Samsung's customers pushed the company toward over seven generations. The display comes from Samsung's own production lines. The three-year exclusive panel agreement with Samsung Display means that dependency runs deep and won't change quickly.

Fast follower is not the same as failure. IDC's projection that Apple captures 34% of foldable market value on just over 22% of unit volume, as cited by Korea JoongAng Daily earlier this year, reflects the premium pricing Apple can sustain and the high switching costs built into its ecosystem. Commercial success in year one looks plausible without out-engineering anyone.

Four things will actually determine whether this device matters: whether iOS multitasking has been rebuilt to use the larger inner display meaningfully; how battery life holds up given the form's extreme thinness; how the crease compares to Samsung's next-generation panel in daily use rather than promotional conditions; and whether the experience, whatever the final price, feels purpose-built rather than borrowed. Those answers will matter more than any leaked render.