iPhone Ultra Leak Shows Apple May Be Learning From Samsung's Foldables

Related Products We may receive commission on purchases made using these links

Watch Ultra 3 [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Running & Multisport Smartwatch w/Rugged Titanium Case w/Black Ocean Band. Satellite Communications, Advanced Health & Fitness Tracking

4.8

$699.99 on Amazon

Watch Ultra 3 [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Running & Multisport Smartwatch w/Rugged Titanium Case w/Anchor Blue Ocean Band. Satellite Communications, Advanced Health & Fitness Tracking

4.8

$699.99 on Amazon

Apple Watch Ultra [GPS + Cellular 49mm] Titanium Case with Midnight Ocean Band, One Size (Renewed)

4.3

$299.66 on Amazon

New leaks around Apple's rumored foldable iPhone point to a wide, book-style device that could feel like a standard iPhone when closed and open into something closer to a compact iPad. Recent rumor coverage has pointed to a possible fall 2026 debut alongside the iPhone 18 Pro lineup, though Apple has not confirmed the device, the timing, or the "iPhone Ultra" name.

The bigger takeaway is not the name. If the latest rumors are close to Apple's current direction, the company appears to be entering foldables with a Samsung-style format instead of trying to invent a new category from scratch. That would make sense. Samsung has spent years refining the Galaxy Z Fold line, and the latest foldable iPhone rumors suggest Apple may be skipping some of the awkward early compromises Samsung had to work through.

iPhone Ultra vs. Galaxy Z Fold7: What the leak suggests

The rumored iPhone Ultra is expected to use a book-style fold, with a wide cover screen on the outside and a larger inner display when opened. That is the same basic pitch Samsung has spent seven generations polishing with the Galaxy Z Fold line: a phone when closed, a small tablet when open.

That cover screen matters. Early book-style foldables often felt too tall and narrow when closed, making them less comfortable for one-handed typing and everyday app use. A wider outer display would let Apple start closer to where the foldable market has ended up, not where it began.

Samsung's current Galaxy Z Fold7 shows where that playbook has gone. Samsung lists an expanded 21:9 cover screen, an 8.9mm folded body, an Armor FlexHinge, an Armor Aluminum frame, IP48 water and dust resistance, a 4,400 mAh battery, and a 200MP main camera. The Fold7 is still a premium, compromise-heavy device, but it is no longer a strange first-generation experiment.

That is the standard Apple would be judged against. A foldable iPhone does not need to be the first of its kind; it needs to feel more polished, more durable, and more useful than the Android foldables that arrived first.

Samsung Display may be Apple's key foldable partner

Apple is also rumored to be leaning on Samsung where it matters most: the display. Current foldable iPhone reporting points to a high-end inner OLED panel from Samsung Display, with a focus on reducing the crease and keeping the device thin enough to feel premium rather than bulky.

That supplier relationship makes the Apple-vs.-Samsung comparison more complicated. Samsung Electronics would be Apple's most visible rival in foldable phones, while Samsung Display could still be one of the most important companies behind Apple's first foldable screen.

The crease remains one of the biggest questions. At CES 2026, Samsung Display showed a foldable OLED concept with no visible crease, but a spokesperson told The Verge that the panel was an R&D concept with no fixed commercialization plan. That distinction matters: Apple may be chasing a near-crease-free foldable, but no public demo proves the exact screen technology that will ship in a foldable iPhone.

The same caution applies to the rumored "Ultra" branding and price. Recent rumor roundups have floated an ultra-premium foldable iPhone with a price likely above standard iPhone Pro models, but those details remain less certain than the broader hardware direction.

The missing piece is iOS

The strongest consumer clue may be software, not hardware. A foldable iPhone only works if iOS can move smoothly between a normal phone-sized cover screen and a much larger inner display.

That is why the newest iOS 27 clues are important. Tom's Guide reported that iOS 27 beta references point to multiple displays, fold-state tracking, and hinge-angle monitoring. Those are not confirmations of a foldable iPhone, but they are exactly the kinds of hooks a foldable device would need.

Apple has also been nudging developers toward more flexible layouts. TechRadar reported that Apple's WWDC 2026 developer guidance pushed apps to support a wider range of screen sizes and aspect ratios. That matters for a foldable iPhone because stretched-out iPhone apps would not be enough. The inner display would need sidebars, split views, landscape layouts, and app continuity that make the larger screen feel intentional.

That is where Apple could put its own stamp on the category. Samsung already proved the book-style foldable can work as hardware. Apple would need to prove that iOS can make the format feel natural.

What Apple still has to prove

The leaks still do not answer the buying questions that matter most: battery life in such a thin body, crease visibility after months of use, repair cost, app continuity, and whether Apple has built a foldable experience instead of a larger iPhone screen.

Battery life could be especially tricky. Foldables need to power larger displays while leaving less room for battery cells than a thick slab phone. If Apple pushes for an extremely thin unfolded design, it will have to avoid making battery life feel like the tradeoff.

Durability is another test. A foldable iPhone would have more moving parts than a standard iPhone, and the inner screen would likely remain more delicate than traditional glass. That makes AppleCare pricing, repair availability, and hinge reliability part of the real buying decision, not fine print.

Then there is multitasking. Samsung's Fold line already supports app pairs, floating windows, taskbars, split-screen use, and Flex Mode-style experiences. Apple does not need to copy every Samsung feature, but it does need a clear answer for why someone should unfold the device beyond watching video on a bigger screen.

The buying questions that matter most

A foldable iPhone would be Apple's biggest iPhone form-factor change in years, but it would not arrive in an empty field. Samsung, Google, Oppo, Honor, and other Android makers have already made foldables thinner, lighter, and more usable than the first Galaxy Fold generation.

Apple's advantage is different. Many iPhone users who want a foldable have not wanted to leave iMessage, FaceTime, Apple Watch, AirDrop, iCloud, and the App Store. For that audience, Apple does not necessarily need to be first. It needs to make foldables feel safe enough, polished enough, and useful enough to justify waiting.

The key takeaway is not the rumored 4.5mm thickness or the possible "Ultra" name. It is that Apple appears to be entering foldables after Samsung has already addressed many of the category's early usability problems: a wider cover screen, a thinner body, stronger hinge engineering, and software built around multitasking.

Four questions will matter more than the render: Can iOS use the larger inner display without feeling stretched? Can the battery keep up with the thin design? Does the crease stay subtle after months of use? And does Apple offer a foldable experience strong enough to justify paying more than a Galaxy Z Fold?